Veritome vs Dastra
Dastra is a French privacy-management platform built for DPOs, with an EU AI Act module riding on top of its records-of-processing model. Veritome starts from the Act itself rather than from GDPR.
Choose Dastra if you already run privacy through a DPO workflow — especially across multiple legal entities or as an external DPO — and want AI systems in the same register as your processing activities. Choose Veritome if the AI Act is the problem you’re solving and you want depth in it rather than an extension of a privacy tool.
| Veritome | Dastra | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting point | The EU AI Act | GDPR records of processing and DPIA |
| Starting price | Free, then €49/mo — published | Not published; AI Act module priced by headcount |
| Best for | SMEs whose main exposure is AI | DPOs, external DPOs, multi-entity groups |
| Multi-entity groups | Single organisation | Strong — many legal entities as standard |
| GDPR / DPIA depth | AI Act only | Deep — it is the core product |
| ISO 42001 | Annex A controls mapped to AI Act articles, sharing one evidence store | Not offered |
| Annex IV / FRIA / DoC generation | Yes — assembled from live data | AI registry and classification; generation not advertised |
| Languages | English (EU languages on the roadmap) | Nine languages, France-weighted |
Where Veritome wins
- Built from the Act outward, not from the privacy data model
- Annex IV, FRIA and Declaration of Conformity assembled from live data
- Hash-sealed dossiers with a public verify URL
- Published price and a free tier
- Deployer duties and Art. 4 literacy tracking built in
Where Dastra wins
- DPO-native workflows built for the CNIL world, not retrofitted from security compliance
- Real multi-entity and external-DPO handling — many legal entities on every plan
- AI systems and personal-data processing in one register, so GDPR and AI Act overlaps are handled once
- A European vendor built around the privacy function rather than adapted to it
Who should choose which
Choose Veritome if…
Your GDPR house is already in order, and what you actually need is accurate AI Act classification, the obligations that follow, and documents that survive scrutiny.
Choose Dastra if…
You’re a DPO — internal or external — managing privacy across several entities, and most of your AI use cases are also personal-data processing. Keeping both registers in one place is a genuine efficiency we don’t offer.
FAQ
My AI systems process personal data — do I need both tools?
Not necessarily. GDPR and the AI Act overlap but impose different duties: a DPIA is not a FRIA, and neither produces Annex IV technical documentation. If your privacy tooling is already good, add AI Act depth rather than replacing it.
Does Dastra offer an ISO 42001 route?
Not that we can find publicly. If certification is your goal, look at vendors built around an AI management system instead.
Last reviewed: 5 August 2026. ← All comparisons
Comparison reflects publicly available information at the last-reviewed date and is provided in good faith. Dastra does not publish pricing; no figure is asserted here. Verify current details on each vendor’s site.