Choose Dastra if you already run privacy through a DPO workflow — especially across multiple legal entities or as an external DPO — and want AI systems in the same register as your processing activities. Choose Veritome if the EU AI Act is the problem you’re solving and you want depth in it rather than an extension of a privacy tool.
| Veritome | Dastra | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting point | The EU AI Act | GDPR records of processing and DPIA |
| Starting price | Free, then €79/mo — published | Not published; EU AI Act module priced by headcount |
| Best for | SMEs whose main exposure is AI | DPOs, external DPOs, multi-entity groups |
| Multi-entity groups | Single organisation | Strong — many legal entities as standard |
| GDPR / DPIA depth | EU AI Act only | Deep — it is the core product |
| ISO 42001 | Annex A controls mapped to EU AI Act articles, sharing one evidence store | Not offered |
| Annex IV / FRIA / DoC generation | Yes — assembled from live data | AI registry and classification; generation not advertised |
| Languages | English (EU languages on the roadmap) | Nine languages, France-weighted |
Both columns, in good faith.
The honest split.
Questions people ask about this comparison
My AI systems process personal data — do I need both tools?
Not necessarily. GDPR and the EU AI Act overlap but impose different duties: a DPIA is not a FRIA, and neither produces Annex IV technical documentation. If your privacy tooling is already good, add EU AI Act depth rather than replacing it.
Does Dastra offer an ISO 42001 route?
Not that we can find publicly. If certification is your goal, look at vendors built around an AI management system instead.
Last reviewed: 05.08.2026. All comparisons →
Comparison reflects publicly available information at the last-reviewed date and is provided in good faith. Dastra does not publish pricing; no figure is asserted here. Verify current details on each vendor’s site.