Job to be done · First assessment

Start with what you already have.

Not a policy, not a framework choice — an inventory. List the AI in use, classify each system against the Act's own order, and let the engine derive what follows. Most organisations find more AI than they expected and less high-risk than they feared.

No card · EU-hosted · 5 minutes to a first classification
Veritome guided classification — the register wizard that walks Article 5, Annex I, Annex III and the Article 6(3) exception
The reality

Why first attempts stall.

What we hear

“We started by writing an AI policy.”

What the product does

A policy written before the inventory describes a company you are guessing at. The classification tells you which duties are real, and the policy then has something to be about.

What we hear

“We only counted the models we built.”

What the product does

A scoring feature inside a bought HR suite is an AI system in use. Deployer duties attach to it exactly as they do to something you trained.

What we hear

“We assumed everything was high-risk to be safe.”

What the product does

That is not caution, it is expense. Building an Annex IV file for a limited-risk chatbot burns the effort the genuinely high-risk system needed.

What you get

A register, not a document.

01

The Act's own order

Prohibited practices first, then Annex I, the Annex III areas, the Art. 6(3) carve-outs and the Art. 25 triggers. The sequence matters because an earlier answer changes what is asked next.

02

Eight questions for most systems

Every answer cites the article it comes from, so the classification is a record you can defend rather than a verdict you have to trust.

03

Obligations derived, not typed

Role plus risk class plus behavioural flags produce the duty list. Nothing is forgotten because nobody knew it existed.

04

GDPR in the same pass

Five data questions decide which data-protection duties join the same register, so it is one list rather than two projects.

05

A reopenable decision

Classifications are records, not one-way doors. When a system changes, reclassify and the obligations regenerate around the work already done.

06

Free for the first system

Classification of one system costs nothing and needs no card, because the point is to find out whether you have a problem.

In practice

Three first passes.

Use case 01

A 30-person agency listing its AI tools for the first time.

  • Eleven tools found; seven were not on anyone's list.
  • Nine land limited or minimal risk — Art. 50 and Art. 4 only.
  • Two need a closer look: a client-facing scorer and an HR screener.
  • Effort goes to the two, not spread evenly across eleven.
Veritome guided classification — the register wizard that walks Article 5, Annex I, Annex III and the Article 6(3) exception
Use case 02

A scale-up that thought it had no EU AI Act exposure.

  • The bought recruitment tool puts them in Annex III point 4.
  • Deployer duties apply: oversight, logs, the Art. 26(7) worker notice.
  • Their own product feature makes them a provider for that one system.
  • One register holds both roles without either contaminating the other.
Veritome systems portfolio — every AI system with its role, risk tier and journey position
Use case 03

A public body preparing for scrutiny.

  • Art. 27 binds: a fundamental-rights assessment is required.
  • It pre-fills from the existing DPIA, which Art. 27(4) explicitly permits.
  • Affected people informed under Art. 26(11), with the notice dated.
  • The classification trail shows how each answer was reached.
Veritome assessments — FRIA, DPIA and conformity assessments per system, with their status and sealed reports
Also included

What follows the first pass.

Straight answers

Straight answers about starting.

Where does a first assessment actually begin?

With an inventory, not a policy. You cannot classify what you have not listed, and most organisations discover during the listing that they use more AI than they thought — a scoring feature inside a bought HR suite counts as much as a model somebody trained.

How long does it take?

The free check is eight questions for most systems. A first pass over a small estate is an afternoon. What takes longer is the evidence behind the obligations the classification produces, and that is the work the deadlines actually bite on.

What if most of our systems turn out to be low risk?

That is the common outcome and it is a real result, not a wasted exercise. Knowing that eight of your ten systems carry only Article 50 transparency and Article 4 literacy is what lets you spend the effort on the two that carry more.

Do we need to classify systems we are only piloting?

The Act attaches duties to putting a system into service, so a genuine internal pilot sits differently from a live deployment. Recording it now costs little and means the register is already right on the day the pilot becomes production — which is the day people forget to revisit it.

What comes out at the end?

A register of systems, each with a role, a risk class and a derived obligation list citing the articles it rests on — plus a classification record you can reopen and a dated decision trail for how each answer was reached.